ESL industry analysis
How attractive to a potential teacher is the ESL industry as a whole?
When thinking about becoming an ESL teacher or when current teachers plan their careers, an objective examination of the industry and how it operates can help these individuals make better decisions.
The world-wide ESL industry is an industry and is shaped by market forces, and language school owners, DOSs, and educational managers need to take financial as well as educational factors into consideration when making all types of decisions which include deciding on the number of students to put into each class and the pay rates for teachers.
Wishing otherwise and ranting about it does not change this fact.
One of the most common tools used to analyze an industry's attractiveness is Porters Five Forces Model developed by the famous Harvard professor and management guru, Michael Porter.
A look at the ESL industry from the perspective of an ESL teacher using this framework might be an interesting and thought-provoking exercise.
Porters Five Forces include:
Supplier power
Barriers to entry
Buyer power
Threat of substitutes
Degree of Rivalry
Supplier power. Low power of suppliers makes an industry more attractive and high power of suppliers makes an industry less attractive. Suppliers have almost no power in the ESL industry.
Barriers to entry.
Low barriers to entry make an industry attractive for those outside the industry, but for existing firms, or in our case, existing teachers, low barriers to entry make the industry less attractive and less profitable as the low barriers to entry keep competition for jobs and customers high even when demand rises.
In many professions, such as being a brain surgeon or a nuclear engineer, the barriers to entry into the professions are very high which limits the number of new individuals entering the professions, at least in the short term. Assuming the demand for these professionals is high, these high barriers to entry usually result in higher salaries as competition between employers for hiring these individuals is high.
In general, the barriers to entry for ESL teachers are low. The primary requirement for becoming an ESL teacher is a good understanding of the English language, which includes most native English speakers and many others. For many, one can go from a totally unrelated profession to become an ESL teacher in a matter of days. If a 4-week training course certificate becomes a mandatory qualification, it would only raise the barrier to entry slightly as one could still go from a totally unrelated profession to becoming an ESL teacher in less than 2 months.
Without wanting to engage in the endless debate as to whether teachers should be required to have a degree or not, existing teachers who advocate that all teachers should be required to have a degree are probably less interested in the education of the students as they are in raising the barriers to entry to the profession which is intended to benefit those currently teaching. It is speculated that raising the barriers to entry of the profession will not have much impact on teachers' salaries due to the other three forces we will exam next. Whether or not raising the barriers to entry by increasing levels of qualifications required in the profession would result in better education for the students is a debate for others more qualified than I to engage in.
Buyer power
In general, the more options for buyers, the more power they have and the less attractive is the industry. The fewer options that buyers have, the more attractive the industry as sellers can get away with charging higher prices. For students going to public primary and high schools, the "customer" may have little choice and has to accept the teachers presented to them. But in much of the ESL industry, buyers have substantial choices which increases competition, brings down prices and therefore limits the salaries schools can pay. The relatively high bargaining power of the buyers generally puts downward pressure on salaries paid to ESL teachers.
Threat of substitutes
When there are multiple ways to meet specific needs, the greater the threat of substitutes and the less attractive the industry. There are varying degrees of substitutes. Substituting a meal of pork and rice for a meal of chicken and rice is a pretty close substitute to end hunger for many people. But, while substituting riding the bus for putting gasoline in one's car does satisfy one's need for transportation, it is a fairly distant substitute. .
There are many substitutes, both close and distant that limit the attractiveness of and the ability to pay high wages in the ESL industry. For native English speaking teachers, a close, but imperfect, substitute is non-native speaking teachers of English. Whether or not native English teachers are better than non-native speaking teachers of English is a debate I am neither qualified nor interested in engaging in, but we do know the market values native English speakers over non-native speakers of English in the ESL industry. However, the willingness of the market to pay native over non-native speakers is limited. Students may be willing to 1.5 or 2 times as much to learn with native English speakers, but few students would be willing to pay 3 to 5 times as much. The availability of this substitute will always limit the salaries of the majority of native speaking ESL teachers.
There are many other substitutes for students instead of paying money to take English lessons. An important substitute and one that is likely to increase with improvements in technology is self-study. But the most important substitute is the option to not study English at all. For most students, studying English is not an absolute requirement, instead it is often an investment in one's future. However, if the current costs are too great, forgoing English lessons is an option available to many students and this substitute will always limit the amount all but the most elite schools can charge and which of course limits the amount schools can pay teachers.
Degree of Rivalry
In some industries companies fight tooth and nail for every customer resulting in low profits for almost everyone in the industry, the current airline industry is a good example of this. In other industries, competition is less fierce and competitors do not try to run others out of the industry resulting in higher overall profits and ability to pay higher wages for most organizations within the industry.
The degree of rivalry in the ESL industry probably averages out as moderate, at least in Thailand. In the private school and university sectors the rivalry for students does not generally appear to be very intense, but in the language school and corporate training sectors the degree of rivalry might be considered fairly high.
There are many ways ESL schools, teachers and businesses compete. First is price. Price matters to the vast majority of the customers. Although this does not mean customers automatically seek out the lowest possible price, but there is only very limited space in the top end of the market and the vast majority in the business need to maintain competitive prices to attract business. This need to maintain competitive prices results in downward pressure on profits and ability to pay high salaries.
Educational quality is very difficult to measure, therefore customers often take into consideration the institution's reputation when making purchasing decisions. Therefore competition by reputation is an important factor in the industry. Reputation is a very important selling point in the university and private school sectors. We also see some of the most successful language schools remain successful year after year and much of this can probably be attributed to the reputation of these institutions. How can a positive reputation be created? It appears it can be done through a combination of appearance of the school, the perceived quality of instructors and a campaign of brand building.
It is important to mention, quality of teaching staff is very difficult to measure, and it is the perception of the customers of the quality that really matters from a financial standpoint. Therefore it is not surprising the personality of the teacher is often more important than qualifications is creating the perception of quality. Schools gain a reputation for being good schools by providing teachers that students perceive as being of high quality. The golden rule of business is the customer is always right and customers determine what is quality, not the service providers. Schools who provide teachers the students don't like are not likely to stay in business for long.
Conclusion
Looking at these five forces, we can see the ESL industry is not the most attractive choice of occupation from a financial standpoint and the low barriers to entry, the relatively high bargaining power of buyers, the substantial threat of substitutes and the moderately intense level of rivalry will always limit the financial rewards one can expect from teaching English or otherwise becoming involved in the ESL industry.
But what the use of Porters Five Forces Analysis does not identify are the intangible benefits of joining the profession. Being an ESL teacher allows one to travel the world while getting paid. Also there is the joy one gets from helping students achieve their goals and watching the students grow personally. For most, teaching English is a fairly low stress occupation and many are willing to trade some income for this lower level of stress. While not being a high paid profession, teaching English in foreign lands does have a number of attractive features.
The purpose of this article is neither to encourage nor discourage individuals from becoming or remaining ESL teachers, but to provide some food for thought so each individual thinking of becoming an ESL teacher, making a decision about staying in teaching or thinking about how to advance within the ESL teaching profession can make a more informed choice.
Scott Hipsher often teaches strategic management, as well as other subjects, at a variety of universities and is the author of Expatriates in Asia: Breaking Free from the Colonial Paradigm,
The Nature of Asian Firms: An Evolutionary Perspective,
Business Practices in Southeast Asia: An interdisciplinary analysis of Theravada Buddhist countries
as well as numerous book chapter, academic journal articles, conference papers and other articles on international business and other topics.
Post a Comment
(no sign-in required)
Comments
There are compelling points in the article that may either encourage or hinder new arrivals in the ESL industry. The industry is a double-fauceted one (business-educational), so it all depends on how the buyers and the providers perceive it. Obviously, the presence of a stereotyped, blue-eyed native speaker of English without any qualifications and fundamental knowledge of language acquisition, teaching methods, learner styles, etc. may seem to be glamorous for sometime, but it it is not a permanent solution.
By Khody Farpour, Toronto (19th June 2012)
Tom
I think a bigger and more interesting question is the product life cycle of “formal education” as a whole. Is there a need for formal education and “schools” when we have the world’s information available to us at our fingertips?
For example, I finished an hour long lecture this week while in Hanoi to students located in many different locations around the world. I am teaching another class where the students are located in 16 different countries on five continents. Is this the future of teaching and learning?
What added value do teachers and schools bring to the learning process in this digital age?
Since I do not have a crystal ball, I would not be surprised if the world of formal education is radically altered in the next 20 years or if it will only go through only incremental changes.
By Scott Hipsher, Hanoi (This week) (6th March 2010)
Agree with most of what you say Bob. I also mentioned the point about a teacher being blonde and largely unqualified and not all that capable in the pedagocical department in another post (see Steve Crawford's recent blog).
In fact, this also taps into yet another business dynamic - supply and demand. The latter is huge in Thailand with an estimate shortfall of teachers required of at least 100,000+, so schools are generally happy when they manage to get hold of a farang blue-eyed wonder for no other reason than they are thin on the ground these days.
And again, this is one of the main reasons (other than plain ignorance) why so many parents and administrators choose the doe-eyed wonder over a more experienced, more qualified non-native speaker e.g. Phillipinos, Indians, other Europeans, and is the central reason why the overall standard of EFL teaching in Thailand is quite poor.
That being said - you get what you pay for which explains why many of the salaries on offer are quite low as well.
Tom
By Tom Tuohy, Saudia Arabia (27th February 2010)
Scott has illuminated a number of interesting points about potential monetary gain and the real benefits of a career in EFL being in the travel and cultural experiences that would otherwise be closed avenues to many teachers.
I once read somewhere that if you look at EFL's industry life cycle, as Tom Touhy suggested, it is no longer a growing new sector. In fact in many places it is a saturated market with increasingly declining profits, stagnant salaries and little investment. It is on it's plateau heading for the precipice of decline, although that is probably a long way off and may never happen.
Only certain areas are growing, geograhically China and apparantly IELTS and TOEFL prep and the likes are growing areas.
As for EFL in Thailand, Scott's point about educational quality being quite hard to measure and perceived quality of teachers is spot on. Thai schools want a white blonde haired adonis in designer suits and hat full of tricks. The guy may be thick as pig shit and a hopeless teacher, but the students and the fee paying parents will love him.
By Bob, Saudi (27th February 2010)
Interesting. Maybe next time you can use the Product Life Cycle and evaluate where the Thai EFL industry is on that scale?
I recently wrote that it was reaching maturity with signs like external validation, international accreditation, and recognition for some of the locally produced courses, but as always there are many other factors that need to be considered as well.
I'd be interested to hear what others have to say on the subject.
Tom
By Tom Tuohy, Saudia Arabia (25th February 2010)